Vain Jangling
There is a need of”‘formal deprogramming’ for many supporters of former President Trump.”

Regardless of who one is or why one did/does support former President Trump, (it is believed by some that) you may fall into the category of a “basket of deplorables” (i.e. “worthy of severe condemnation or reproach”) and/or might even need some type of (undefined) “formal deprogramming.”

It is not enough that one may agree/have agreed with (some/all of) his policies or decisions, but that by association, it is likely you are part of a cult (whether you realize it or not) who are “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, etc.” and possibly upset because you “don’t like gay people, or Black people, or the woman who got the promotion at work [you] didn’t get, etc.”

So, how would one go about determining who needs this “formal deprogramming?” Would it be by survey with such questions like, Did you vote for Trump?, Did you agree with any Trump decisions or policies?, Would you vote for or support Trump in the next election?, etc. Or, would a “bipartisan” (of course) committee or group get to decide, by using public records, a snitch hotline, or the tracking of electronics, to determine who they deemed needed this “formal deprogramming,” which they or another entity would formulate and implement?

Many of the same individuals who use “hate speech” in their broad strokes of vain jangling against those who voted for/supported former President Trump (and especially any/all who still do or would) believe in the murder of humanity, relationships against nature, and feelings over science. Do they likewise need some type of “formal deprogramming?” “You know,”…so we can have people who are…”responsible and accountable” leading our country.

Vain Jangling
Females in the military should have the right to an abortion. It is their body, their choice.

The vain jangling of this entire argument is “their body, their choice” didn’t matter when it came to Covid 19 shots and boosters. Why not? Because there are many other “contract related” regulations that control what one can/cannot do with or to their body while in military service.

] A military female wants an abortion —it’s her body— let her have it, taxpayers cover the cost.
] A military female does not want the Covid shot/booster —its’ her body— punish, remove her.

“Her body, her choice” is merely a vain jangling catch phrase. Don’t forget some of these same individuals desired to control the bodies of the entire country with mandates based on a host of questionable “facts and science” that has sense been proven a good bit less reliable.

Vain Jangling
White women need to stop following their white husbands to fight racism.

There seems to be an attack on white women to stop following, obeying, submitting —perhaps even agreeing— with their white husbands. (The mention of ‘white’ husbands is because it appears that only ‘white’ men can be racist.) Failure to do so (apparently) only encourages or continues racism.

White women are accused of having a desire for their husbands, sons, children, and themselves to do well. These sound like good desires, for any wife, mother, grandmother, etc. What person would not want their family, friends, neighbors, etc. to do well? An unloving person (regardless of skin color).

White women are accused of wanting to protect the patriarchy because it benefits them. Well, it is biblical (Ephesians 5:22-33), and the wife does benefit from, “Husbands, love your wives…as your own body.” The children likewise benefit from a father/mother home. So, wives (all wives) benefit from a loving husband and biblical home. (Not that all women must get married.)

The vain jangling: That a white woman (or any woman) has to vote the way someone wants them to (differently than their white husband), to prove they are not just (obediently, submissively) going along with their husband (with no thought or freedom of their own).

The truth: The individuals spouting this just want women to be obedient, subservient to how they want them to talk, act, and vote. To go along with policies that lack rationale and are harmful to their children, families, and society. They simply want women to leave one “patriarchy system” to join another (in which they —the individuals, not the white women— “hold power”).

Vain Jangling
Parental secrecy is a good thing.

Children are not (and should not be) expected to make mature, adult decisions. Nor should (other) adults overstep their boundaries, by usurping the authority given parents to raise their own children. It is mere vain jangling to argue that children as young as five years old need to be enlightened and encouraged toward sexuality (experience, orientation, transitioning, etc.) —and by those who are not their parents, not even kin. To claim that somehow being a teacher, a “professional”, authorizes one to instruct a child without the knowledge and permission of their parent is a red-flag. It opens the door to predators and our children need to be protected.

They (our children) can make their own decisions when they are more mature, better prepared, and understand the consequences (good or bad) of their choices for the rest of their lives. It is why we set ages as 18 and 21 for certain life choices. When parents will still be there and most (if not all) of the “professionals” will have moved on to other children. Any argument against parental rights, parental knowledge is mere vain jangling.