DEI is god

Vain Jangling
DEI as in deity, diversity, equity, and inclusion is god.”

DEI (Latin) = God (English)
via Google Translate

latin-dictionary.net
1. Divine essence/being, supreme being
2. god
3. God (Christian context)
4. Statue of god

The use of DEI to represent “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” seems to go back to 2021 (or possibly before). Some may note that “DEI is more than race and gender. It’s faith too.” While others ascribe to “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” claiming to “respect the separation of church and state as a constitutional principle and practice.”

D.E.I. has been defined, in part, as “a conceptual framework that promotes the fair treatment and full participation of all people.” However, neither Diversity nor Equity nor Inclusion individually or collectively as a sort of “trinity” = deity, a divine essence or supreme being. Although, some may worship them, the idea, or a dei as (a) god, it is mere vain jangling to believe (they are) or (it is) the one true God.

That is Just [opposing]-Wing Conspiracy Jargon

Vain Jangling
That is just [opposing]-wing conspiracy jargon aimed to “delegitimize government institutions or government officials,” etc.

There are those who accept conspiracy theories. Believing “we the people” are being told a lie or that things are being done in secret.

There are those who blame conspiracy theories. Believing they are used to manufacture lies or to create mistrust within “we the people.”

Perhaps there can sometimes be a bit of truth in both, based on the theory and the circumstances as things unfold. Therefore, it is something that one should be cautious, studious, and honest about.

However —whether right-wing or left-wing— it is interesting to note the vain jangling, when it is found out at the end of the day. (Which often happens, even if years or decades later.)

The amount of energy spent on hiding and denying the truth, while working to silence and discredit those in opposition —to the lie, the cover up, the conspiracy— must be exhausting, expensive.

Then when exposed, “we the people” are simply given more vain jangling as if such things can be brushed aside to move on, with no care to the destruction and consequences unjustly forced upon others in the wake of the true originators of mis— and/or dis— information.

Public Prayer for [this athlete] Okayed

Vain Jangling
Public prayer for [this athlete] okay.

In an amazing, ecumenical, non-partisan event, persons were able to gather, of their own freewill, to share their faith, by taking a knee and praying together, on the field, on national television—without the media, politicians, organizations, or other players screaming in outrage or demanding action against it.

Even though everyone realizes injuries are possible in sports, no one enjoys to see someone get seriously hurt; especially life threatening. The individuals are usually sent warm thoughts, get well wishes, and prayers through words, cards, social media, or commentary. We desire for them to recover, to be okay, to be able to play again. But, is this the only time faith, prayer is welcomed, approved, allowed?

It is mere vain jangling to vocally oppose individuals taking a knee or using scripture, approve the prosecution of individuals praying on the field, reject the televised displays of faith…then seemingly support (act okay with or remain silent regarding) the unified, public display of prayer for [person or reason]. It is either right or wrong, good or evil.

Prayer is a good thing. Especially for each other. We should exercise it.

My Pick Proves I Am Not Racist, etc.

Vain Jangling
I will pick a (color) (gender) person.

It is quite interesting how one can claim it is wrong, racist, etc. to not pick a person based on their color, gender — yet feel empowered, woke, intelligent, fair, etc. by picking a person based on their color, gender.

What happened to choosing a person to fill a position based on character and qualifications? Is that so wrong these days? Is it biased to desire the best person for the job to be considered and blessed with the opportunity, regardless of color, gender? Perhaps that would make all of us strive to be better.

I Believe in Science

Vain Jangling
I believe in science.

Make no mistake, Christians can and do believe in science. However, some professing Christians, along with non-Christians, sometimes use science in place of or in defiance to scripture. Then, there are times when some use emotion, opinion, choice, over scripture and science.

Science states that matter (energy) cannot be created or destroy, while some believe all of creation started with a Bang (without origin).

Science detects a heartbeat of a conceived child, while some believe it is not a separate being and can be discarded as desired by the woman (up to nine months, and, for some, even beyond birth).

Science acknowledges the assigned (male or female) gender of every conceived child, while some believe gender is based on personal choice, which can be defined or changed as desired.

The vain jangling is claiming to believe in science, yet deny it when convenient (or its inconvenient). Similar to professing belief in scripture, only to deny it when the (reasoning of) science seems to better fit one’s wants, desires, choice.

To the Best of My Knowledge

Vain Jangling
To the best of my knowledge…no one told me or I didn’t know.

In truth, no one knows everything. That is a given. Such is why we have a wealth of knowledge in written form, along with parents, teachers, preachers, coaches, trainers, supervisors, and the like who help us read, study, understand, and exercise wisdom found in the vast information.

It is also a given, that there are times one can desire, even intentionally, to ignore, reject, or go so far as to try to silence that which ones does not want to hear, learn, know, believe, or be held accountable to. In direct contrast to one having a learning disability or mere laziness.

Examples would be…

A child who refuses to heed the wisdom of their parents or to pay attention to the instruction of their teachers. A Christian who refuses to read the Bible, lest they come under conviction for their fellowship—or lack there of—with the Lord. A politician who refuses to do what is morally best, because of arrogance or to evade the appearance of being too close to the other side.

Vain jangling is when you try to claim, “To the best of my knowledge…”
…but in reality you only listen to or allow one set of ideas, thoughts, conversation (and ignore, silence, reject any and all alternatives)…
…thinking you can (falsely) say you didn’t know or no one told you.

Vaccination and Masks

Vain Jangling
If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask.

In May 2021, Americans were told by the CDC and Biden that “they have concluded that fully vaccinated people are at a very, very low risk of getting COVID-19. Therefore, if you’ve been vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask.” From the White House transcript, where Biden states, “Let me repeat: If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask.” [source]

In July 2021, Americans were told by the CDC that it “recommends you wear a mask when you’re in public and indoors, like work and in a grocery store. That’s true for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Why? Because even if you’ve been fully vaccinated and protected from severe illness from COVID-19, you could have the Delta variant in your system and spread it to someone who isn’t vaccinated.” [source]

The vain jangling is not in the possibility of spreading COVID mentioned by the CDC, but rather the initial promise that once vaccinated you would no longer need to wear a mask. The reality is, both vaccinated and unvaccinated are getting COVID; therefore, both vaccinated and unvaccinated can be carriers (and thus spreaders) of COVID. It may be argued “We didn’t know” or “We were hopeful” because “we are learning” or “now we have a variant”, but the fact is these are professionals who are supposed to know or at least not make promises when they do not know. It only creates mistrust and more vain janglings.